The first photo…is compensated for motion and focus. By compensating for motion on the object in question, the rest of the picture changed:
The second photo…is a crop and adjustments. After the adjustments were made, I reduced the size again (for email purposes). Notice on the left side of the object, there appears to be some type of vents or ribs in a dark outline:
The third photo is the same as the second one… [and] has brightness adjustment.
The second [object] in the picture is just there smaller, to show more contrast. The top appears to be an indentation, with a protrusion from the center. There is also one from the bottom. The object reminds me of a Roulette wheel and spindle. I'm not calling it that:
Unfortunately, there is also pixelation produced in the three pictures.
There are too many people that tend to pass photos off as being Photoshopped.
Also, unfortunately, there are too many times that people fake this type of thing.
I am not a debunker, but only my own skeptic. I am not an expert, but with working on the motion of the original picture, I would tend to believe the object in question is real because of the difference in motion between the background and the object.
Both appear to motion blur but in different perspectives.
As far as my belief, I would also have to call this inconclusive. It is too bad that you don't have a higher res pic. Hopefully, you can show that the negative came from the same roll.
Denver Page
No comments:
Post a Comment